AI Styling Studio — Infinite avatar looks from just 1 photo.Try it now.

BestAITools

Submit your Tool

8000+ AI tools already listed
8K+Tools
100K+/moViews
25K+/moVisitors

AI NewsI put Google’s 24/7 AI assistant Gemini Spark to work, and it’s actually pretty useful

I put Google’s 24/7 AI assistant Gemini Spark to work, and it’s actually pretty useful

11:12 PM IST · May 30, 2026

I put Google’s 24/7 AI assistant Gemini Spark to work, and it’s actually pretty useful

Gemini Sparkis Google’snew 24/7 agentic assistant, designed to help you help you “navigate your digital life,” which essentially means getting your online to-dos done, summarizing the things you don’t have time to read (like the entirety of your inbox), or organizing something that would have otherwise involved too much screen time-filled manual labor, like a personal expenses spreadsheet. The service was firstintroducedat Google’s annual developer conference in May, where CEO Sundar Pichai joked that Spark, which runs on virtual machines in the cloud, means that “yes, you can close your laptop.” The in-joke here is that he’s comparing Spark to other agentic AI systems, like the ever-popular OpenClaw, which require keeping the machine awake to run its tasks. Spark, he’s suggesting, is agentic AI for the rest of us — those who would rather get things done without nerding out about it by setting up an always-on AI machine. In practice, Spark is still very much designed for work-adjacent tasks, given its integration with Google’s productivity apps like Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, and Slides. (After all, how many times are you preparing a deck for in your personal life? Unless you’rea Gen Z creator explainingthe latest meme to your chronically offline friends, that is?) Google also struggles a bit to come up with real-world examples that would convince someone that Spark is a “must-have” rather than a “nice-to-have” tool for personal use. Among its suggestions for “personal productivity” is using Spark to scan your emails and calendar for the day and send you a recap with your top three must-do tasks,” which already assumes you are a person who jots down your to-dos in a calendar or email app, instead of a notepad (virtual or otherwise), or just keeps a running list in your brain. (E.g.,Grab prescriptions and shampoo at Walgreens. Buy more dog food. Hang out with friends on Saturday.) Google also suggests you could use Spark as a weekend planner, by drafting a Google Doc “suggesting three free activities based on my open calendar blocks for the upcoming weekend,” which, again, assumes you are some sort of scheduling nerd in your offline life. Nevertheless, with early access to Gemini Spark, I decided to put it through its paces, with what are perhaps some real-world suggestions of my own. I came away surprised that it was a fairly useful implementation of consumer AI, but not one that deserves to have its own brand. For one initial task, I asked Spark for help with a shopping-related research. The idea was to help me with an everyday local drugstore trip for household items, so I asked Spark for product suggestions based on weekly deals and coupons I could clip. At first, Spark seemed to do pretty well here, as it told me exactly what products were on sale that matched my needs, and suggested coupons to clip in the Walgreens app for extra savings. It even suggested how I could stack coupons for one item by combining online promo codes, if I were placing an online pick-up order and was planning to spend more on personal care items. However, as is often the case with AI, the devil was in the details, as one of the promo codes was invalid when I tried it, despite meeting what the AI said were the requirements. Still, Spark pointed me to some other savings — like buy-one-get-one-free and rewards deals that made up for this gaffe. In another test, I asked Gemini for help with a packing list for a day trip out of town. I asked it to check the weather, gather the event details, and make suggestions of what to bring with us, like sunscreen or water, to see what it would come up with, after it learned more about the activity. I asked for the final list to be imported into Google Keep. Guess what Spark can’t do? Use Google Keep. That’s a huge oversight, given that Google’s notetaking app would be essential for anything in the realm of personal productivity. Instead, it offered to make me a doc or draft me an email because, sure, that’s the sort of thing I’d want to check for my list of to-brings. (??) In terms of the list itself, however, Spark was spot-on, suggesting lawn chairs or blankets, water, sunscreen, sunglasses, a light layer for when the sun goes down, a reusable shopping bag, and an umbrella for possible light showers that day. It also reminded me that dogs were not allowed, despite the event being outdoors. (Sorry, Princess!) My child has aged out of summer camps for kids (and should probably just get a job), but before we went that route, I wanted to scour the local area to find out if there were any summer activities available for teens that she could do in addition to her engineering camp in June. I asked Spark to do a thorough search and find any and all suggestions, keeping in mind that we would not want to drive more than around 30 minutes. Spark generated a decent list of ideas for activities that matched my child’s interests, and plotted out how far they were from home. Unfortunately, I forgot to prompt Spark to get the costs or dates of the programs, and it didn’t bother to tell me, which meant I still had to do more manual research on my own. Like many, I subscribe to too many newsletters, so I put Spark to work on preparing me a weekly summary, which would arrive every Friday, focused only on the top five posts or articles I shouldn’t miss reading, along with a link. The AI got to work, digging into my inbox and, within moments, had presented a summary of several interesting articles to read that included context and a link. (The link ended up being a Google.com redirect that didn’t work — I had to click the link displayed on the redirect page, as it never automatically sent me to the site in question.) While I generally liked the suggestions, Spark only returned four articles to read when I had requested five. Spark had interpreted the request as “4-5” for some reason. For another request, I asked Spark to compile a list of weekend activities around town for me on Fridays, so I can get to planning my weekend fun. As someone who lives in a smaller city, there aren’t always big events or things to do, so making sure you don’t miss the anticipated street festival or hot show when it comes to town is key. But there’s no single source to find everything there is to do — you have to read multiple local newsletters, visit websites and Facebook Groups, read the newspaper online, and more. Spark instead set up a web search, combined (at my request) with a search of my Gmail for any relevant local newsletters, digests, or lists with keywords indicating a local activity suggestion. It then compiled a list of upcoming weekend events and noted that if I wanted to add any to my calendar, I could just reply. If it wasn’t for Spark, I would have never known there is an Annual Beaver Queen Pageant nearby, which apparently features people in beaver costumes raising money for wetland conservation? OK, I might need to check that out. (You still have to tell Spark to add it, then click a button to confirm, but this is easier than the manual labor of reading through so many sources for ideas.) For my last request, I set Gemini Spark to work on tracking price drops for an expensive eye cream. As a penny-pincher, I’d never buy it unless there was a crazy sale. I wanted Spark to keep track of the price changes for me and alert me if the eye cream ever became more affordable. However, Spark’s interpretation of this request was to simply recheck the price every two weeks to see if it dropped below my target. I’m not sure that would be frequent enough to spot a deal. (I’ll update if the results are successful, but I believe I’ve set too low a bar as my target — even after raising my bar by another $10! — so this is probably just wishful shopping at this point. But I’m always hopeful some online retailer will make a pricing mistake one day!) I can already see how I’ll be able to integrate Spark into my everyday life in other ways, too — I already have ideas for more email monitoring and cleanup tasks, for instance. The next time I change the home’s air filter, I’m going to ask Spark to remind me in three months to swap it out. If I ever get around to taking a vacation, I’ll probably have some tasks for it then, as well. While Spark already performed fairly well on my tasks with only small quibbles, the biggest criticism I had was that there’s no need for this to be a standalone product with a different branding. I think that adds to consumer confusion in this day and age, where there are so many things happening in the AI space, and where every new model has its own name and number, and some of these are quite wild. (Nano Banana, anyone?) Why not just pitch Spark as something Gemini can do out of the box, instead of making it its own product? Why does the toggle have to say “switch to Spark,” instead of just “switch to Tasks?” (If it even needs to have its own space in the user interface!) I personally don’t want to carry the mental load of trying to determine whether something is a question or a task; I just want to type in a question or request and be done with it. I also think the lack of Keep integration is a major miss in terms of being helpful with your personal productivity. Google Docs is overkill for a packing list. And, unfortunately, for iPhone users, tapping into Gemini Spark directly from your device through a push of a hardware button or gesture won’t be possible — unless Apple announces this at next month’s WWDC? Instead, you’ll need to launch the Gemini app and use it from there. (Another issue with having Spark as its own toggle within Gemini — you can’t program the iPhone’s Activity Button to go directly to Spark, which is separate from Gemini’s chatbot interface. How great it would be if everything Gemini does were all in a single destination! Ugh!) And while Spark will later be able to do more with MCP integrations, not being able to set it to perform certain tasks, like booking your favorite date night restaurant regularly through Resy or looking for flight deals on a preferred booking engine, for instance, makes Spark feel somewhat lacking for the time being, given that not everything you do online takes place in Google’s universe of services. (Also, I’d really like to text Spark. I wish that were an option, too.)

read more

Latest AI News

View All News →
Alphabet plans to raise $80B to pay for AI buildout

Alphabet plans to raise $80B to pay for AI buildout

Google parent company Alphabet said Monday that it plans to raise $80 billion to help pay for the massive AI infrastructure buildout it has planned. Alphabet will sell off that amount in stock and will then use the funds to pay for “general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures to scale AI infrastructure and global compute,” the company saidin a statement. Part of the plan involves selling $10 billion in stock to Berkshire Hathaway, the massive global holding company formerly led by Warren Buffett. “The company is experiencing strong demand for its AI solutions and services from enterprises and consumers, at levels that are exceeding the company’s available supply,” Alphabet said in its statement. “By scaling its investments, the company seeks to expand its foundational infrastructure to support the significant growth opportunity ahead.” The company added that the stock plan represented a way to “fund its investments in a balanced way while retaining a healthy balance sheet.” Like other tech giants, Google has announced plans for a massive investment in compute this year, the likes of which will be used to support a flurry ofnew AI services. At Google I/O last month, CEO Sundar Pichaisaid thatthe company expects to spend between $180 billion and $190 billion on capex before the year is out. Google and other tech giants areexpected to spendas much as $700 billion this year on AI capex.

44 minutes ago

View

Water access is now a risk factor in SpaceX’s IPO

Water access is now a risk factor in SpaceX’s IPO

SpaceX has added new language to its IPO filing that warns prospective investors about the company’s access to a potentially scarce resource: water. The company, which now includes Elon Musk’s AI play, xAI, wrote in anamended version of the filingon Monday that access to water — required to cool its data centers — is just as important as SpaceX’s ability to secure power, processors, and other critical resources. The addition comes amid an ever-evolving debate about how much water data centers use, and whether that usage is contributing to localized droughts that are being made worse by climate change. Deep in the “risk factors” section of SpaceX’s IPO filing, the company added language about water to a section about the challenges of scaling AI infrastructure. Previously, SpaceX focused on telling investors that its data centers were primarily constrained by access to “power at economically feasible prices,” along with long construction timelines and material shortages. The amended filing adds multiple lines about water access. SpaceX now tells prospective investors in the IPO that data center buildouts are constrained by the “availability of power and water at economically feasible prices.” The company goes on to say that “significant water resources may be required for cooling large-scale data center operations.” Water availability is such a concern that SpaceX says it has become a “critical consideration in data center site selection, development and operations.” SpaceX also says that “water scarcity, drought conditions, competition for local water resources, or regulatory restrictions on water use could limit our ability to obtain sufficient water for cooling, constrain data center cooling capacity, increase our costs, delay or limit expansion of our data center infrastructure, or require us to implement alternative cooling techniques that may be more costly or less available.” It’s not clear what inspired SpaceX to add this language about water to its filing, or why it was left out of the initial version. The company is in the pre-IPO period, during which the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been sending SpaceX “comment letters”seeking clarification or additional details about the filing. It’s possible that questions from the SEC led to this particular change, though we won’t know until those comment letters are made public in the weeks following the IPO. Adding more detail about SpaceX’s access to water was not the only change the company made in this first amended filing. SpaceX also revealed that it is setting aside up to 5% of the stock being sold in the IPO foremployees and friends of executives. SpaceX also added language that warns investors that the company mayissue a “significant” numberof shares in future transactions following the IPO — a hint at a potential merger with Tesla — which could create dilution for existing shareholders.

4 hours ago

View

Florida sues OpenAI, Sam Altman, in first-of-its-kind lawsuit over violent incidents

Florida sues OpenAI, Sam Altman, in first-of-its-kind lawsuit over violent incidents

OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, were sued by the Florida Attorney General on Monday, in a first-of-its-kind state litigation effort over ChatGPT’s alleged links to a number of violent incidents. The lawsuit accuses OpenAI of looking the other way on safety concerns as it has sought to prioritize winning “the AI arms race and amass large fortunes.” “Today, we announced the first-in-the-nation state-led lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman,” said Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier. “OpenAI and Altman ignored internal and external safety warnings, put children at great risk, and allowed a dangerous product to reach millions of Floridians.” “Because of Defendants’ misrepresentations about ChatGPT and their careless introduction of ChatGPT to Florida and the world, mass shooters have been aided and abetted in deadly rampages, vulnerable people have been encouraged into suicide, professionals have suffered public humiliation, users have lost critical thinking skills, and minors have become addicted to a tool that feigns human compassion to collect their data with no parental oversight,” the83-page lawsuitclaims. The Florida Attorney General’s office launcheda criminal investigationinto the company in April. That probe sought to determine what role ChatGPT may have played in a mass shooting that took place last year at Florida State University. Prior to the attack, the shooter is alleged to have consulted the chatbot. OpenAI has also beensued in a civil suitby the family of one of the victims of that shooting. OpenAI has previously denied responsibility for the Florida shooting. “Last year’s mass shooting at Florida State University was a tragedy, but ChatGPT is not responsible for this terrible crime,” an OpenAI spokespersonpreviously told NBC News. TechCrunch reached out to OpenAI for comment. OpenAI justconcluded a different legal caseinvolving former co-founder Elon Musk, who sued the company in 2024, accusing it of having betrayed its original mission to help humanity by converting the organization into a for-profit business. The case concluded after the jury swiftly decided that Musk had waited to long to file the case and that thestatute of limitations had passed. This is only the latest legal case that has attempted to link ChatGPT to violent deaths. Last year, OpenAIwas suedby the parents of Adam Raine, a California teen who took his own life after discussing suicide with the chatbot. In that case, ChatGPT allegedly offered “technical specifications” for various suicide methods, despite also referring him to mental health resources. Other lawsuits — including ones alleging the chatbot’sculpability in suicides,stalking, andmurder— are ongoing.

4 hours ago

View

Nvidia chases $200B CPU market with AI agent PCs from Microsoft, Dell, and HP

Nvidia chases $200B CPU market with AI agent PCs from Microsoft, Dell, and HP

Nvidia opened Taipei’s enormous Computex trade show on Sunday with a spark, literally. The chipmaker unveiled a new PC CPU called the RTX Spark, which it dubbed a “superchip,” and named a who’s who list of PC makers that will soon deliver AI PCs powered by it. The super-fast, 1-petaflop chip is designed to run AI agents like OpenClaw or Hermes Agent securely, according to Nvidia. Such RTX Spark Windows PCs will be available this fall from ASUS, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Microsoft Surface and MSI, with models from Acer and Gigabyte to follow. In addition to being equipped with secure sandboxes (jointly developed with Microsoft) to run agents securely, the PCs will also have enough CPU, GPU, RAM and underlying Nvidia CUDA software to run local versions of large language models. Nvidia said that its RTX technology will deliver faster performance for AI, better image quality, and support for AI features in more than 1,000 games and applications. The chipmaker is marketing this as an alternative for creators making AI content, as well as providing a significant upgrade to its traditional market of gamers. Nvidia said more than 100 Windows software makers have signed on to support the new chip, including Adobe, Blender, ComfyUI, Riot Games and Xbox. But Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang’s vision for these new PCs is far larger. He wants to end the days of launching apps, pointing, clicking and typing. “With RTX Spark and Microsoft Windows, you ask — and the PC does the work,” he said in the press release. “Frontier models. Creative workflows. RTX games. All on a laptop.” Last month, after delivering another record quarter, Huang promised investors he had found a new$200 billion market for Nvidia in selling CPUsfor AI, not just GPUs. He made specific mention of the high-end server CPU released earlier this year called Vera — of which Nvidia says it has already sold $20 billion worth. He also hinted at his bigger ambitions. “We’ll have billions of agents, and those billions of agents will all use tools. And those tools are going to be like PCs, just like us humans using using PCs today,” he said on the earnings call in May. “We’re going to need a lot more CPUs.” Nvidia ARM-based Windows devices have been tried before — and failed. Back in 2013,Microsoft famously had to write off $900 millionon its Nvidia ARM-based Surface RT, with partners like Dell also bailing on the product. But at this point, after delivering record after record of quarterly revenue, it’s hard to bet against Huang as he pursues his PC dreams once again. And this chip is an entirely different beast. It’s more powerful, not less. Microsoft is positioning its own RTX Spark PC as so mighty that it named it the Surface Laptop Ultra, and iscalling it“the most powerful Surface Laptop ever built.” Still, PC manufacturers have not released a lot of specifics about each of their offerings, including pricing. These systems appear to be full-fledged Windows versions of theDGX Spark mini-computerthat Nvidia already sells to developers for about $4,800. We’ll have to wait and see if these PCs will compete on price with the affordable Mac Mini that has becomea popular choice for running OpenClaw. Or perhaps they will sit at the high end of the PC market, like Nvidia’s own agent-running mini computer. Either way, if Nvidia has cracked the code on bringing AI agents easily, safely, and usefully to the masses, it could — and should — be big.

4 hours ago

View