AI Styling Studio — Infinite avatar looks from just 1 photo.Try it now.

BestAITools

Submit your Tool

8000+ AI tools already listed
8K+Tools
100K+/moViews
25K+/moVisitors

AI NewsElizabeth Warren calls Pentagon’s decision to bar Anthropic ‘retaliation’

Elizabeth Warren calls Pentagon’s decision to bar Anthropic ‘retaliation’

9:19 PM IST · March 23, 2026

Elizabeth Warren calls Pentagon’s decision to bar Anthropic ‘retaliation’

Anthropic is attracting an increasing number of supporters in its fight against the U.S. Department of Defense, which last monthdesignated the AI lab as a supply-chain riskafter it refused to make concessions on how its AI could be used by the military. In a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) equated the DoD’s decision with “retaliation,” arguing that the Pentagon could simply have terminated its contract with the AI lab,CNBC reports. “I am particularly concerned that the DoD is trying to strong-arm American companies into providing the Department with the tools to spy on American citizens and deploy fully autonomous weapons without adequate safeguards,” Warren wrote, per the report, adding that the barring of Anthropic “appears to be retaliation.” Warren’s words echo many other organizations that have spoken out against the Defense Department’s treatment of Anthropic. Several tech companies and employees — including fromOpenAI, Googleand Microsoft — as well as legal rights groups, have filed amicus briefs in support of Anthropic and denouncing the designation, which is usually applied toforeign adversariesand not U.S. firms. The dispute arose afterAnthropic told the Pentagonthat it did not want its AI systems to be used for mass surveillance of Americans, and that the technology wasn’t ready for use in targeting or firing decisions of lethal autonomous weapons without human intervention. The Pentagon contested that a private company shouldn’t dictate how the military uses technology, and soon after designated the company as a “supply-chain risk.” The label requires any company or agency that does work with the Pentagon to certify that it doesn’t use the designated company’s products or services — effectively barring Anthropic from working with any company that also works with the U.S. government. The letter from Warren comes a day before a hearing in San Francisco on Tuesday, when District Judge Rita Lin will decide whether to grant Anthropic a preliminary injunction that seeks to preserve the status quo while itscase against the DoDis litigated. While Anthropic is suing the DoD for infringing on its First Amendment rights and punishing the company based on ideological grounds, the Defense Department hasmaintainedthat Anthropic’s refusal to allow all lawful military uses of its technology was a business decision, not protected speech, and that the designation was a straightforward national security call and not punishment for the company’s views. The AI lab last week submitted two declarations to the court thatclaim the government’s logic is flawedas they depend on technical misunderstandings as well as points of concern that were not raised during the company’s negotiations with the DoD. Warren has also written to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, asking for details of thecompany’s agreement with the DoD, which came just a day after the Pentagon blacklisted Anthropic. Anthropic and the Defense Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

read more

Latest AI News

View All News →
The AI jobs debate just got messier

The AI jobs debate just got messier

AI-related job loss fears grow each time another companyannounces a round of layoffs. Through May of 2026, companies announced that close to90,000 job cutswere tied to AI, and, by some accounts, up to 15% of U.S. jobs areprojectedto beeliminated by AIover the next five years. Promises from the tech industry that AI will also create new jobs does little to ease fears, especially for the generation wondering if anyone will be hiring when they graduate. A recent report from Ramp and Revelio Labs, which track enterprise AI spend and workforce records from nearly 22,000 companies, respectively, complicates that gloomy narrative. The report found that companies spending heavily on AI are growing headcount faster, even in the entry-level roles that many fear are doomed. According to the report, “high-intensity adopters” — firms that spend on average $30 per employee per month on AI in the first three months — saw headcount increase 10.2%. Headcount also rose across functions, includingengineering, sales, administration, customer service, finance, marketing, and scientist roles. The strongest job growth among high-intensity adopters was in the information sector, which includes software, internet, media, and tech-adjacent firms. Despite these positive signals, the data isn’t as rosy as it seems. It skews heavily towards tech-forward, knowledge-work firms — ones that might have VC-backing and are growing fast anyway, making it difficult to say whether AI is contributing to the hiring or just showing up at companies that are expanding anyway. “This paper does not show that AI universally creates jobs,” the paper’s authors admit, “but it does counter claims that AI will lead to broad job losses.” It also counters claims that AI is killing all junior jobs.Recent researchfrom Goldman Sachs found that AI has already erased about 16,000 net jobs per month over the past year, with Gen Z and entry level workers taking the brunt of the burden. But in tech-forward firms, the report finds that entry-level headcount actually rose by 12%. So what can we take away from this? Perhaps that AI isn’t always a tool for labor substitution, but that it can be a tool for firm-expansion instead. “For software and technology firms, AI can make core output cheaper or faster to produce: writing code, debugging, building internal tools, producing technical documentation, and supporting product development,” the report reads. “Lower production costs in these workflows can raise the return to expanding the whole firm, not just the engineering team.” But companies that buy subscriptions and run pilots, yet did not go on to make sustained investments, don’t tend to see any gains in headcount, per the report. That sets up the potential for awidening gapbetween firms that have the resources — like capital, technical staff, founder networks, and management bandwidth — to turn AI adoption into actual business gains and those that are stuck experimenting with subscriptions. In other words, this report suggests that firms that already have the resources are the ones who will see the largest gains. The paper’s authors speculate such a divide may continue to grow, saying: “Firms without those channels may fall behind.”

2 hours ago

View

Gujarat Taps IBM, IAIRO to establish Industrial AI Centre of Excellence

Gujarat Taps IBM, IAIRO to establish Industrial AI Centre of Excellence

Envisioned as a ‘living lab’, the Industrial AI CoE will support the development, testing, and adoption of industrial AI applications

2 hours ago

View

CoreWeave Launches ARIA to Help Researchers Find Hidden Patterns in AI Experiments

CoreWeave Launches ARIA to Help Researchers Find Hidden Patterns in AI Experiments

ARIA analyses thousands of experiment runs in minutes, surfaces hidden patterns and recommends improvements to accelerate AI innovation

2 hours ago

View

Delhi to Roll Out AI-Enabled PUCC 3.0 Ahead of Winter Pollution Season: Report

Delhi to Roll Out AI-Enabled PUCC 3.0 Ahead of Winter Pollution Season: Report

The new PUCC 3.0 system will use AI, geotagging and encrypted data transmission to curb fraudulent vehicle emission certificates.

2 hours ago

View