AI agent Poke makes setting up automations as easy as sending a text

5:46 AM IST · April 9, 2026

IsPokean OpenClaw for the rest of us? That’s the idea coming from a new startup offering an AI agent that you can access via iMessage, SMS, Telegram, and, in some markets, WhatsApp. The AI agent Pokelaunchedpublicly in March, allowing consumers to access a personal assistant that can take action on their behalf through a familiar interface. Today, Poke can help with everyday needs, like daily planning, managing your calendar, tracking your health and fitness, controlling your smart home, editing your photos, and more, all via text message. While you may still interact with a general-purpose AI chatbot like ChatGPT or Claude when you have questions or want to do research, you’d turn to Poke when you want to get something done quickly, or when you want to automate some task to save you time. For instance, you could ask Poke to alert you to specific emails (like those from your family or your boss), or remind you in the morning if you need to take an umbrella with you. It could help you track your health and fitness goals, or let you know the score to last night’s game. Poke could send daily medication reminders, or catch you up on the day’s news, and more, since users can write their own automations in plain text and then share them with friends. Backed by Spark Capital, General Catalyst, and other angels, the 10-person startup has more recently added another $10 million to its coffers, on top of last year’s $15 million seed round. It’s now valued at $300 million, post-money. Starting today, personal superintelligence is just one tap away.No download, no signup.Text Poke for free now:https://t.co/VIWYU64dUI🌴—0:00 – What's Poke?0:50 – Introducing Poke Recipes1:25 – Create a Recipe in 10 seconds1:43 – Earn on Poke2:44 – Build with npx…pic.twitter.com/LHLFRVgahk The tool arrives as demand for agentic AI systems is spiking, leading OpenAI tosnap up OpenClaw’s creator, and Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang to warn thatevery company needs its own OpenClaw strategywhen announcing Nvidia’s enterprise-grade alternative. But for those less technically inclined, the prospect of having to install software through the terminal, manage dependencies, and troubleshoot errors is daunting. Plus, systems like OpenClaw raise security concerns due to its deep system access. For many people, then, OpenClaw and other agentic systems still feel out of reach. The team behind Poke wants to change that. Marvin von Hagen, co-founder ofThe Interaction Company of California, the Palo Alto-based startup behind the new AI agent, tells TechCrunch that Poke emerged from watching how beta testers were using the company’s earlier product, an AI assistant for email, built around a year ago. “What we noticed there was that people wanted to use Poke for everything… Even though it was only meant for email, people started asking Poke to remind them to take their medication. They asked Poke about sports results — ‘Hey Poke, tell me every morning if I need a jacket or not,’” explains von Hagen. “And at that time, we didn’t have a lot of this functionality, but we noticed how we needed to become general-purpose much more quickly, because people just like the personality and the humanness of it so much.” The team then partially pivoted and focused on making Poke more useful, proactive, and more personable. Unlike OpenClaw, getting started with Poke is easy. You simply visit Poke.com, click “Get Started,” and enter your phone number. There’s no app to install as the assistant operates over text messaging. Under the hood, Poke turns to the AI model that best fits the task, whether that’s a model from one of the big AI providers or an open source model. “I think this is also one of our main strengths in the long run: that almost all of our competitors are just big tech and labs that are bound to a specific provider. Like Meta AI will only ever be able to use Meta models, and ChatGPT will only ever be able to use OpenAI models,” von Hagen points out. To work over messaging platforms like iMessage, Poke alsoleverages Linq, a solution that enables AI assistants to live within messaging apps. The app can run through SMS and Telegram, too, but WhatsApp support is currently limited asMeta barred other general-purpose chatbotslast fall. That could change, however.Regulators from the EU, Italy, andBrazilopened antitrust probesto fight this decision, which has brought Poke back to Brazil. It will hopefully also allow Poke to work on WhatsApp in the EU when Meta brings the costs down. (Meta has seen pushback over the high fees it’s charging — von Hagen says it’s a form of “malicious compliance” that he believes will soon be addressed.) At launch, Poke offers a variety of “recipes” — or pre-made tools that help you automate various aspects of your life or work. These span categories like health and wellness, productivity, finance, scheduling, travel, home, school, email, community, and, for those who are technical, developer tools. Installing them requires a click of a button and then a standard authorization process, if needed. These recipes are designed to work with apps and services you already know, like Gmail, Google Calendar, Outlook, Notion, Linear, Granola, and others. There are health and fitness “recipes” that work with Strava, Withings, Oura, Fitbit, and more, as well as those that work with smart home devices from companies like Philips Hue and Sonos. Developers using Poke can also automate parts of their workflow via integrations with tools like PostHog, Webflow, Supabase, Vercel, Devin, Sentry, GitHub, Cursor Cloud Agents, and others. Poke’s security model is multi-layered and includes regular penetration testing, security checks, various tools, and limiting permissions for both agents and human employees. By default, the team can’t see anything inside the tokens, unless the user manually opts to provide access to a log file or analytics by flipping a switch in their settings to opt to share this information. (TechCrunch has not performed its own security audit, to be clear.) Over the past couple of weeks,Poke’s usershave created thousands more recipes and automations, which the company plans to add to its recipes directory for discovery in the near future. It’s also encouraging creators to build these shareable recipes by offering to pay somewhere between 10 cents and a dollar (based on geography) for every user who signs up for Poke via the recipe. The cost to use Poke is surprisingly affordable: it’s free to start, then pricing is flexible. During the beta tests, users actually had to negotiate with the AI agent what price they’d pay per month, which ranged between $10-$30 — or so Poke told us in response to this question. Von Hagen says that, now, pricing is based on how the AI agent is being used. If you’re asking for things that don’t require real-time data, you could probably use Poke for free. What costs Poke money is real-time inference, like automations that run on every incoming email or real-time flight check-ins. To set prices, the company gave Poke guidance on how expensive things are, which allows it to determine personalized pricing. While the company has managed to make Poke more efficient to reduce costs, the goal right now isn’t profitability, von Hagen notes. “We really don’t want to make money, but we really want to grow. We want to build a product for a billion people and monetization is really secondary,” he says. “The goal for the next weeks and months now is to bring Poke into everyday life.” To do so, it will look to creators and influencers to showcase how they’re using Poke. I built "tastebuds", an MCP server on@interaction’s Poke Recipes to crowdsource opinions on food.When you’re looking for a place to eat, Poke recommends food spots in your area that other Poke users have enjoyed before by storing their reviews, all running quietly in the… The company, co-founded byFelix Schlegel, isn’t sharing how many customers have signed up, beyond noting that the figure has 10x’ed over the past couple of months. (However, we did spot Poke at the top ofVercel’s AI Gateway leaderboard, for whatever that’s worth.) In addition to its main institutional investors, Spark Capital and General Catalyst, the startup has attracted the attention of a number of angels, including John and Patrick Collison (Stripe founders), Jake and Logan Paul, Logan Kilpatrick from DeepMind,Joanne Jangof OpenAI, and Scott Wu and Walden Yan (Cognition founders). It also included Vercel co-founder Guillermo Rauch, PayPal co-founder Ken Howery, Dropbox co-founder Arash Ferdowsi, Mercor co-founder Brendan Foody, Hugging Face co-founder Thomas Wolf, Flapping Airplanes co-founder Ben Spector, and several others.

Latest AI News

View All News →

Why Wall Street thinks US memory maker Micron is the next Nvidia

Micron, the Boise, Idaho-based memory chip maker, has captured Wall Street’s heart. Whether the love affair endures will heavily depend on how long the AI-driven supply crunch for memory chips lasts. Micron promises that it has shored up its position for the long term, which would allow it to withstand a sudden drop in demand or overcapacity of supply. And Wall Street has become a believer, helping Micron briefly surpass the market valuation ofMeta and Teslafor the first time on Thursday, though it floated back down by Friday to nearly match them. Specifically Micron closed Friday’s trading with a market cap close to $1.27 trillion, while Meta was at $1.39 trillion and Tesla was at $1.42 trillion. Micron’s stock has soared over 236% in the past month alone, closing Friday at $1,132 a share. In comparison, it spent years upon years before mid-2025 at below $100 a share. It’s a dizzying rise for a company that most consumers associated with the tiny memory cards that, back in the day, were commonly needed to boost PCs, smartphones, or other device storage. Wall Street isn’t sweating over that product line. Micron is benefiting from the AI data center buildout boom that has created a shortage of system memory chips, both DRAM and NAND, which Micron makes, particularly High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM). A single AI server requires magnitudes more memory than a laptop. AI system makers like Nvidia, as well as the hyperscalers building their own systems, are buying up large quantities of memory, such as Microsoft, Amazon AWS, Google, Meta and Oracle. This is forcing all the other companies who need memory to hoard it as well, from PC makers like Dell and HP, to other kinds of device makers. This lack of supply, which has been dubbedRAMageddon, is predicted to persistinto 2027. And it’s already driving up the price of consumer electronics like Apple products and Xbox consoles. With the whole tech industry clamoring for more memory, Micron’s delivered blockbuster third-quarter earnings last week. Revenue quadrupled year-over-year to $41.45 billion, and profits skyrocketed from $1.88 billion to $28.2 billion over the same period. Micron also provided a positive outlook, forecasting fourth-quarter revenue of between $49 billion and $51 billion. And Wall Street, which has been eager to find more public AI-related companies that may do as well as Nvidia, became even more enamored. The historic problem for memory chip makers like Micron and Samsung is that building out manufacturing facilities to increase capacity is a time-consuming, expensive endeavor. And demand often falls just as companies can increase capacity, creating a glut and subsequent price drop. Micron got ahead of any AI bust chatter by emphasizing a series of long-term supply agreements, including with Nvidia and AI labAnthropic, that would presumably protect it. The company said in its earnings presentation that it has signed 16 strategic customer agreements across the data center, consumer, and auto market segments, which it expects tofundamentally transform its business model. That seemed to convince a number of analysts that this company could be another long-term, profitable investment. In a research note, William Blair tech analyst Sebastien Naji noted demand growth continues to outpace the rate that new cleanroom space can come online. “Given the strong likelihood of continued ASP growth in the coming quarters and improving revenue visibility thanks to a rapidly expanding set of long-term agreements (SCAs) with key customers, we see potential for more durable earnings growth and reiterate our Outperform rating,” Naji wrote. Whether Micron really can sustain itself for long-term without a bust cycle remains to be seen. But for a brief moment on Thursday, this U.S. company was more valuable than some of the industry’s giants.

2 hours ago

View

Dating Apps are Hardcoded to Match Looks. Wavelength's AI Wants to Fix That

Rejecting traditional swipe-based algorithms, Wavelength uses conversational AI to match people based on personality and behavioural insights.

14 hours ago

View

SoftBank’s CEO isn’t the only one with questions about Elon Musk’s orbital data center hype

Not everyone is buyingElon Musk’s vision for orbital data centers. Masayoshi Son, the founder and CEO of Softbank,argued at a recent shareholder meetingthat building data centers in space won’t do much to cut costs and will take too long when “in the battle for AI, the next few years will be far more important than what might happen a decade or so from now.” On the latest episode ofTechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I discussed Son’s remarks as part of a broader discussion that includedOpenAI’s plans for custom chips, chipmakerGroq’s new $650 million funding, and much more. Kirsten noted that it’s “very ironic” that Son is playing the skeptic here, given SoftBank’s “long history of wild bets.” Sean, meanwhile, said that when Musk talks about “making a constellation of satellites — satellites that need to be replaced every few years as well — to make up an ‘orbital data center,’” he’s just “guaranteeing that much more business” for SpaceX. Keep reading for a preview of our conversation, edited for length and clarity. Sean O’Kane:Listen, neo-clouds are the new oil, and everybody who wants to make money is pivoting to a neo-cloud. I’m proud to announce that TechCrunch is now a neo-cloud, give us all your money. I mean, this is the thing you do. It seems like there are so many players that are compute constrained, so anybody who has a shot at being able to lease out that compute is taking it, whether that’s Groq, a company that was semi-hollowed out by Nvidia, or Allbirds, which went into bankruptcy and and emerged from it as a new neo-cloud provider instead of selling shoes — Tim Fernholz didan interview with the new CEO of of that new effortthat I would definitely recommend people go read. Or whether you’re SpaceX, where your idea was: I’m gonna build an AI platform that’s gonna have an addressable market the size of U.S. GDP, but before we get there, we’ll just rent out our compute. And we saw this continue to happen with SpaceX, where it’s not as big as the deals that they’ve struck with Google or Anthropic, butthey just signed another deal, [their] first post IPO deal, to rent out compute to another smaller player. They’re continuing down that road. You know, I can see this being a business for Groq in the near term. The question with all of these is how durable is it in the long term. Anthony Ha:If we’re talking about SpaceX and their AI business and data center business, we also have to talk about these comments that Masayoshi Son, the CEO of SoftBank, made recently, where he basically said:What is the point of data centers in space?Which is a question we’ve asked on this show. And it speaks to, again, this sense in the industry of being really, really compute constrained — they need to build as many data centers as possible, [and] there’s all kinds of reasons why that is proving to be challenging here on Earth, so maybe space is the answer. But I think Son makes some pretty fair points about: All this stuff we’re talking about, even if it all works — and the costs are going to be very, very serious to make it work — this is not happening for years and years and years, so this is not a solution to any immediate problem, as far the current need for data centers goes. Kirsten Korosec:I just want to point out that SoftBank has a long history of making wild bets. I think it says something when Son comes up and asks the question that a lot of people have asked. I mean, there are a lot of VCs and founders [who] have been swept up into the idea of orbital data centers and it seems like suddenly everyone’s on board. When just a couple of years ago, I think, if someone had mentioned that, it would get slapped down a little bit. So I do think it’s an important part of the process that someone who has a pretty high profile is asking that question. But it is very ironic to me thatheis the one asking it, because if you look athis pitch deck, they’ve thrown a lot of money at some pretty bold ideas. Sean:WeWork! Listen, we’re going to be saying this for a lot over the next couple years. The idea of putting these things in space is going to be an interesting engineering challenge and certainly an interesting economic challenge. Anthony, what you said is definitely right to a certain extent. Elon Musk is a person who hates red tape and you know, there are no NIMBYs in space so of course he’s going to try and do that. To me, it comes down to: The business as it stands now for SpaceX, especially its launch business, is just overwhelmingly reliant on Starlink. The reason that they are 80 or 90% of the launch market globally is not just because they’ve done all these things that are better than pretty much every other launch provider around the globe, it’s also because they have Starlink that is driving up that number. If you remove Starlink from the equation, they would be closer to — I don’t know, maybe 20% or 30% of the launch market, or 40%, but it certainly wouldn’t be 90%. And when you talk about making a constellation of satellites — satellites that need to be replaced every few years as well — to make up an “orbital data center,” quote unquote, you’re just guaranteeing that much more business for your launch business. And I just can’t stop myself from coming back to that point. Kirsten:I want to really quickly say that [SpaceX’s] other big business is renting out their compute, by the way. So back to the chip conversation. We’ve come full circle. Anthony:One of the other themes that may run through this episode is this idea oftalking your own book. This is not a new phenomenon. Executives at tech companies, or any other company, what they’re predicting for the future is ultimately the future that is going to be advantageous to their business. But I think it’s something that’s just always worth remembering when we’re having these conversations about big AI companies, because it is this moment of incredible uncertainty, and we’re all wondering: What does the job market look like in the future? What effect is this going to have on the environment? What are the skills I need to learn? All these AI CEOs or AI investors, they all have thoughts on that. And it’s not that they’re wrong or that they are being deliberately misleading, but in each case, there’s an asterisk to these predictions. In Musk’s case, he’s talking about something that would be very good for SpaceX’s business. In SoftBank’s case, they arevery, very heavily invested in data center projectshere on Earth. Sam Altman is the other notable figure who’srolled his eyes a bitat the orbital data center idea — and again, he and Elon Musk obviously havea long and complicated history together. All of which is to say that there’s just no objective, impartial observers here. It’s all these people with baggage and tremendous amounts of money at stake.

22 hours ago

View

Apple Vision Pro exec is reportedly leaving for OpenAI

Paul Meade, the Apple vice president in charge of the Vision Pro headset, is leaving the company to join OpenAI’s hardware team,according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. Meade also reportedly led the development of the AI-powered smart glasses thatApple plans to launch next year. The costly Vision Pro was not a hit, but Apple is hoping that more affordable smart glasses willhelp it compete with wearable devices from Meta. Gurman frames this departure as a byproduct ofJohn Ternus’ imminent elevation to Apple CEO, and of Ternus’ decision to shake up the hardware engineering team, which left some of the company’s vice presidents feeling like they’d been demoted. OpenAI, meanwhile, is already working with Apple’s former chief design officer Jony Ive on an AI device that CEO Sam Altman has claimed will bemore peaceful and calm than an iPhone, though reports last fall suggested the company wasstruggling to get the details right. TechCrunch has reached out to Apple and OpenAI for comment.

1 day ago

View

Submit your Tool

BestAITools.online is an AI Tools Directory helping individuals, businesses, and creators discover the best AI tools for writing, coding, design, productivity, and more.

Contact Promote Terms of Service Refund Policy Privacy Policy Email

AI agent Poke makes setting up automations as easy as sending a text

Latest AI News

Why Wall Street thinks US memory maker Micron is the next Nvidia

Dating Apps are Hardcoded to Match Looks. Wavelength's AI Wants to Fix That

SoftBank’s CEO isn’t the only one with questions about Elon Musk’s orbital data center hype

Apple Vision Pro exec is reportedly leaving for OpenAI

Quick Links

AI Tools by Task

Alternatives

Best AI Tools

Top AI Tools

Browse & Compare

Featured Lists

Discover